|
Post by mark on Aug 15, 2014 21:03:57 GMT -5
Yes I know they say that about everything that hits the market. Anyone used one of these yet?
www.hmresearch.net/#!sluices/c21k9
|
|
|
Post by cabarrusgold on Aug 16, 2014 8:05:57 GMT -5
Driscoll was suppose to get one. Pricy...
|
|
|
Post by Gold Seeker on Aug 16, 2014 16:10:46 GMT -5
The only bad reviews I have heard about the Gold Well is the price and that's from people that haven't bought one, all reviews I have seen or read from people that have bought one or use one is that they work very well, I know a couple of guys out in Arizona that own one.
There's a video out there by Reed Lukens where they use one of the 6" X 36" Gold Well sluices setup as you would a normal stream sluice, they only classified down to 1 1/2" even though the manufacturer recommends to classify down to 1/4", they put the 6" sluice inside a larger flared sluice to utilize the wider flare of the bigger sluice to really put a ton of water through the Gold Well, and then ran somewhere around 1/2 cubic yard or more of the 1 1/2" material and claimed that the 6" Gold Well even with a much higher water flow and feed rate still retained around 99% recovery, they use an A-52 at the end to recover and see what gold was lost.
|
|