|
Jawbone
Jun 4, 2014 19:00:07 GMT -5
Post by indyme2 on Jun 4, 2014 19:00:07 GMT -5
Hard to beat a jaw with teeth.
|
|
|
Jawbone
Jun 4, 2014 19:48:26 GMT -5
Post by ywevis on Jun 4, 2014 19:48:26 GMT -5
river? How old is that?
|
|
|
Jawbone
Jun 4, 2014 20:13:28 GMT -5
Post by indyme2 on Jun 4, 2014 20:13:28 GMT -5
Yep. River. One and a half million years old. Florida.
|
|
|
Jawbone
Jun 4, 2014 22:46:45 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by jpgold on Jun 4, 2014 22:46:45 GMT -5
Indy do you think rivers closer to the coast have better fossils, artifacts, and pottery or is it more driven by chance and knowing the history of the location.
|
|
|
Post by indyme2 on Jun 5, 2014 5:09:11 GMT -5
Indy do you think rivers closer to the coast have better fossils, artifacts, and pottery or is it more driven by chance and knowing the history of the location. Great observation, jpgold. Rivers closer to the coast are better. They were under water or on dry land more often than areas farther upstate and inland. Therefore, we get both land, fresh and saltwater fossil remains. For artifacts, coastal areas are better too. The first settlements were close to the seas and later people moved inland. You're on it!
|
|