Rhinehart Third Court of Appeals Decision in

[uregold]

Oct 10, 2014 4:49:50 GMT -5 ridgeline said:

Gold seeker its groups like this that draw attention and ruin spots like 7 dredges in creek at one time u and i know this is true and for this group.

and its people like you that want to keep starting crap over the internet. btw what does your post have to do with what oakview2 said in the first place.... nothing that's what so drop it.

[ridgeline]

I didnt start anything just commented and stated facts groups ruin the hobby and that includes this group getting run out of numerous spots all i was saying in the first place was that this thread would be better suited in the cali section

[Gold Seeker]

OK, back on topic...

The lower court on 10-07-2014 requested a rehearing on the appeal and opinion by the Third Appellate Court, basically the lower court by requesting the rehearing was saying that the lower court thinks the 3 Justices of the Third Appellate Court made some mistakes during the appeal trial!!!

"10/07/2014 Rehearing petition filed. By respondent."

It was just announced that the Third Appellate Court denied the lower's court's request for a rehearing!!! :lol: :lol:

"10/10/2014 Order denying rehearing petition filed. HULL, Acting P.J. (RoHh)"

It's looking better all the time!!